01221nas a2200145   4500008004100000245017900041210012600220300001100346490000700357520055000364653002400914653005600938100003300994856004801027       2004                        eng d00aТипология на назоваването при древните индоевропейски термини за някои опасни и хищни животни0 aТипология на назоваването при древните индоевропейски термини за  a5–230 v293 a<p>The goal of this study is to analyse the characteristic ways of naming some predators (bear, wolf, fox, lynx, wild cat) from the period of Indo-European unity to the time of the differentiation and separation of the Indo-European dialects. The main task is to reveal the important influence of the religious-mythological world view and of the rational understanding of everyday life as extralinguistic factors working on the appearance of a number of terms with different inner form which take the place of the ancient archetypal zoonyms.</p>10aContrastive Studies10aсъпоставителни изследвания1 aПопов, Борислав  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/84301032nas a2200145   4500008004100000245011400041210010800155300001200263490000700275520043800282653002400720653005600744100003700800856004900837       2002                        eng d00aТермини за ‘встъпвам в брак’ в българския и румънския език0 aТермини за встъпвам в брак в българския и румънския език  a16–580 v273 aThe article discusses the terms referring to marriage which are shared by Bulgarian and Rumanian. Seven different patterns are established under which the terms occurring in the dialects of the two languages are subsumed. The main goals are to clarify the motivation of each pattern, the spread of the terms, the existing synonymy, and the chronology. Special attention is paid to the origin of the patterns and the individual terms.10aContrastive Studies10aсъпоставителни изследвания1 aАлексова, Василка  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/107601629nas a2200145   4500008004100000245011500041210011500156300001200271490000700283520103300290653002401323653005601347100003101403856004901434       1997                        eng d00aТекстовые функции лексемы one и её переводческие эквиваленты0 aТекстовые функции лексемы one и её переводческие эквиваленты  a18–460 v223 a<p>The paper is a detailed contrastive study of the dictionary definitions of the items one and един and their functions in original texts and their translations. On the basis of this analysis the author concludes that all the various functions of one, because of which it is often defined as belonging to various classes of words (or parts of speech), can by systematized and presented as a cline, starting with its basic numerical use to denote the singleness of an object of speech, or a certain quality of this object. Then come its more or less purely structural functions as a substitute for the name of such an object or quality, already mentioned in the text or existing in the common index-field of the participants in a speech act, or as a prop-word. Following along this cline is the use of one as a noun, i. e. with denoting functions, and finally as a morpheme with an active word-formative pattern, the elements of which are used with a variety of pragmatic nuances of the invariant meaning of singularity.</p>10aContrastive Studies10aсъпоставителни изследвания1 aЗлатева, Палма  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/1742