00930nas a2200121   4500008004100000245018000041210012600221300001200347490000700359520036000366100003300726856004900759       1988                        eng d00aПриложение на хронологичния и динамичния принцип към българските и френските глаголни времена0 aПриложение на хронологичния и динамичния принцип към българските  a10–150 v133 aIn the article, the principles of chronology and dynamism are applied to verb tenses in French and Bulgarian. It is established that the two languages show great similarities in terms of the use of verb tenses in parataxis. However, there exist essential differences between French and Bulgarian as far as the use of verb tenses in hypotaxis is concerned.1 aСимеонов, Йосиф  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/286900938nas a2200121   4500008004100000245020800041210012700249300001100376490000700387520034000394100003300734856004900767       1986                        eng d00aПроблематика на подчинените допълнителни изречения в съвременния български език в съпоставка с френския език0 aПроблематика на подчинените допълнителни изречения в съвременния  a5–120 v113 aThe co-ordination possibilities of the Bulgarian indicative tenses in object clauses and in the various periods and sectors of the metaphoric temporal line are contrasted to the corresponding possibilities of the French indicative tenses. Thus a framework is set up which can be used to model a rather complex item of Bulgarian syntax.1 aСимеонов, Йосиф  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/312002046nas a2200121   4500008004100000245019700041210012500238300001200363490000600375520146100381100003301842856004901875       1984                        eng d00aМодалността преизказност и начини за предаването £ в съвременния френски език в съпоставка с българския0 aМодалността преизказност и начини за предаването £ в съвременния  a13–180 v93 aThe sender of the message in Bulgarian (either in the spoken or in the written media) enjoys the opportunity to encode morphologically his objective or subjective attitude towards the contents of the message by alternatively using two morphologically marked verb forms within the framework of one and same grammatical tense. A three-way correlation is defined among the past tense forms based on their identical referential value. The correlation is characterized by the following componential features: objectivity + eye-witness perception by the speaker (седеше ‘He was sitting’); objectivity + second-hand information, supplied to the speaker (седял е ‘I was informed he had been sitting’); subjectivity + lack of information by the speaker (седял ‘He may have been sitting’). Citational modality varies from a minimum to a maximum degree of subjectivity, i. e. from the purely narrative function to the emphatic uses of the verb forms. When the speaker suddenly switches from the ‘lack of information’ state to the ‘eye-witness perception’ state he reacts emotionally to the objective entity he is witnessing (че той седял / бил седял! ‘He might have been sitting’, ‘Sitting he was, indeed!’). This general semantic outline is used as a starting point for the contrast of linguistic means used to render the various semantic components of the Bulgarian citational modality forms in French.1 aСимеонов, Йосиф  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/335401088nas a2200121   4500008004100000245020200041210012600243300001200369490000600381520049700387100003300884856004900917       1981                        eng d00aОпит за комплексен анализ на френските двойнономинални съчетания във връзка с българските им съответствия0 aОпит за комплексен анализ на френските двойнономинални съчетания  a31–380 v63 aThe problem of the complex relations existing in bi-nominal combinations in French and their correspondences in Bulgarian is treated in conformity with the principles of operational linguistics. The analysis of the structural variants is made on the basis of criteria of universal character which are reduced to verbal ideas expressed with the verbs of motion included in the lexical set aller → (être) // venire → (être), and the basic verbs of the trinomial être – avoir – faire.1 aСимеонов, Йосиф  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/377001362nas a2200121   4500008004100000245020800041210012600249300001200375490000600387520076500393100003301158856004901191       1978                        eng d00aПо въпроса за хронологичната координация при подчинените допълнителни изречения в българския и френския език0 aПо въпроса за хронологичната координация при подчинените допълни  a34–400 v33 aThe author studies contrastively the formal means used in Bulgarian and French in the organization of the chronological co-ordination as regards the introducing fact in subordinate object clauses. The study shows that within the framework of non-actuality, Bulgarian uses both the past tenses system (plusquamperfectum, imperfectum, futurum praeteriti) and the primary co-ordination system (perfectum, praesens, futurum), while French makes use only of the past co-ordination system. In the past, i. e. when the fact of the subordinate clause has ceased to be actual, the use of the grammatical tenses of the primary co-ordination system, though surprising to the foreigner, does not mean that Bulgarian is illogical; on the contrary, it shows its originality.1 aСимеонов, Йосиф  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/415901118nas a2200121   4500008004100000245023000041210012200271300001300393490000600406520050200412100003300914856004900947       1977                        eng d00aПо въпроса за аспекта на френския глагол и вида на българския глагол (Le problème de la correspondance de l’aspect du verbe fran{\c c}ais et du vid du verbe bulgare)0 aПо въпроса за аспекта на френския глагол и вида на българския гл  a62–1030 v23 aЕtablir la correspondance de l’aspect du verbe fran{\c c}ais (aspect simple, aspect composé, aspect surcomposé) et du „vid“ du verbe bulgare (traduisant l’opposition fondamentale de l’imperfectif et du perfectif) n’est pas une tâche facile. Pour la rendre conforme aux possibilités d’un seul chercheur, l’auteur a choisi comme domaine d’application le cadre des rapports temporels où l’emploi des formes temporelles du verbe fran{\c c}ais est symétrique ou asymétrique.1 aСимеонов, Йосиф  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/4257