01301nas a2200133   4500008004100000245013600041210012500177300001000302490000700312520072700319100004101046700003101087856004901118       1988                        eng d00aБезличност, модалност и кореферентност (в българския и английския език)0 aБезличност модалност и кореферентност в българския и английския   a5–90 v133 aAn attempt is made to establish the systemic significance of the isomorphism between impersonal and modal constructions. While it is natural to express the clear cases of epistemic modality impersonally, there is a choice between personal and impersonal expression when different degrees of „objectified“ (within the proposition) or root modality are meant. Unlike English, Bulgarian sometimes shows an overt lack of subject-predicate agreement, i. e. the modal verb is impersonal. The analysis of personal constructions denoting epistemic modality shows that the presence or absence of co-reference of the modal and the notional verb to the same subject is a universal means of describing the cline of modal meanings.1 aКонстантинов, Юлиан1 aКовачева, Мира  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/279801231nas a2200121   4500008004100000245018300041210012300224300001200347490000600359520066400365100003101029856004901060       1983                        eng d00aПроблемата за граматичния подлог и разговорната употреба на то / it в българския и английския език0 aПроблемата за граматичния подлог и разговорната употреба на то i  a16–260 v83 analysis of the colloquial usage of the Bulgarian neuter pronoun mo shows that the FSP structure of the utterance is of greatest importance. In particular it is the rhematic elements that favour the occurrence of mo in full as well as in one-member sentences. The function of mo has been defined on these grounds. An interpretation of the meaning of mo / it in such sentences has been suggested. It is theoretically possible that in English and other European languages the neuter pronoun behaved once much like mo in Bulgarian. Such an analysis suggests a uniform explanation for the origin of the grammatical subject it in apparently unrelated constructions.1 aКовачева, Мира  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/350300533nas a2200133   4500008004100000245011500041210011500156300001200271490000600283653001100289653001900300100003100319856004900350       1981                        eng d00aМеждународна конференция по исторически синтаксис в Познан0 aМеждународна конференция по исторически синтаксис в Познан  a82–830 v610aEvents10aХроника1 aКовачева, Мира  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/3753