01178nas a2200169   4500008004100000245012100041210012100162300001500283490000700298520046800305653006000773653002500833653003000858653003000888100003100918856005900949       2014                        eng d00aКъм строежа на сложните съставни изречения в Ловешкия дамаскин0 aКъм строежа на сложните съставни изречения в Ловешкия дамаскин  a91 – 1090 v203 a<p>The complex sentences are described from the viewpoint of their conjunctions and correlative elements in the main clause. The paper analyses the mutual juxtaposition of the main and subordinate clauses as well as the optional use of coordinating conjunctions after some types of antepositional subordinate clauses. Emphasis is placed on the frequency and importance of the prospective phenomena present in the literary language during the National Revival.</p>10aanteposition and postposition of the subordinate clause10acorrelative elements10acorrelative use of tenses10asubordinating conjunction1 aДеянова, Мария  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/deyanova201400475nas a2200109   4500008004100000245010800041210010700149300001200256490000700268100003100275856005900306       1987                        eng d00aКъм историята на словореда в българските да-конструкции0 aКъм историята на словореда в българските даконструкции  a23–400 v111 aДеянова, Мария  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/deyanova198701366nas a2200121   4500008004100000245013900041210012300180300001200303490000700315520083000322100003101152856006101183       1987                        eng d00aНякои начини на действие при украинския глагол в съпоставка с българския0 aНякои начини на действие при украинския глагол в съпоставка с бъ  a20–270 v123 aThis is a contrastive study of the distributive and attenuative Aktionsart (mode of action), based on data from Modern Ukrainian and Bulgarian. The following issues are considered: productivity of the Aktionsart (approximate number of lexemes); formal diversity of the exponents (number and relative productivity of the respective word-formative markers in the two languages); distribution of each formal marker, i. e. characterization of the source verbs in terms of lexical semantics, Aktionsart, aspect, in/transitivity; possibility for the formal marker (prefix) to occur as a second to the root affix; stylistic colouring of the derivative verbs; relationship between each Aktionsart and the perfective/imperfective opposition and hence, the position of the respective Aktionsart in the aspectual system of the language.1 aДеянова, Мария  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/deyanova1987-001462nas a2200121   4500008004100000245017200041210012200213300001200335490000600347520089700353100003101250856005901281       1981                        eng d00aПодчинени обстоятелствени изречения със съюза дa/da в българския и словенския книжовен език0 aПодчинени обстоятелствени изречения със съюза дada в българския   a21–300 v63 aThe contrastive analysis of adverbial clauses introduced with the conjunction да reveals the national characteristics of each language belonging to an old common South-Slavonic area – subordination through да. The similarities between Bulgarian and Slovene in that respect con38 cern, above all, the sphere of application of the да conjunction in substance: it introduces almost identical types of subordinate adverbial clauses with the exception of clauses of time, degree and manner (possible only in Slovene). However, the two languages exhibit more or less considerable differences in the inner structure of complex sentences with subordinate adverbial clauses, which differences also concern the functioning of the temporal and modal forms, the role of the correlative indicative elements in the main clause and the stylistic characteristics of some types of subordinate clauses.1 aДеянова, Мария  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/deyanova198101984nas a2200121   4500008004100000245019300041210012600234300001200360490000600372520139400378100003101772856005901803       1978                        eng d00aКонструкции с факултативно предикативно определение в чешкия книжовен език в съпоставка с българския0 aКонструкции с факултативно предикативно определение в чешкия кни  a54–640 v33 aThe following problems were analysed: 1) constructions with non-detached optional predicatives represented by adjectival words and referring to the subject, treated from the point of view of their lexical realization and the transitivity/intransitivity of the verb-predicate; 2) the interchangeability between this predicative and a derivative adverb; 3) the relationship between the two constructions in the sphere of norm and usage. Considerable similarities have been found between Czech and Bulgarian as regards the lexical and grammatical realization of the constructions with predicatives; with a certain quantitative difference in the area of verbs and transitive verbs in particular. The similarities prevail over the differences also with respect to internal word structure and contextual semantic conditions for the substitution of predicatives by derivative adverbs. The main differences are in the speech realization of the two constructions: the predicative has higher frequency in Bulgarian while the relative adverb predominates in Czech. The use of the Czech predicative is further limited by the use of the present participle and other syntactic synonyms which are more widely used. The development of contemporary Czech (the language of prose) exhibits a tendency towards a restricted use of predicative constructions at the expense of synonymous adverbial constructions.1 aДеянова, Мария  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/deyanova197800548nam a2200109   4500008004100000245015200041210012400193260002300317300000800340100003100348856005900379       1970                        eng d00aИстория на сложните минали времена в български, сърбохърватски и словенски език0 aИстория на сложните минали времена в български сърбохърватски и   aСофияbБАН  a2351 aДеянова, Мария  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/deyanova197000424nam a2200109   4500008004100000245007600041210007600117260002300193300000800216100003100224856005900255       1966                        eng d00aИмперфект и аорист в славянските езици0 aИмперфект и аорист в славянските езици  aСофияbБАН  a2021 aДеянова, Мария  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/deyanova1966