01581nas a2200121   4500008004100000245020200041210012600243300001200369490000600381520098000387100003301367856005901400       1978                        eng d00aДопълнителната информация, носена от формите на страдателния залог със sein в немския и съм в българския език0 aДопълнителната информация носена от формите на страдателния зало  a53–610 v33 aThe additional connotations expressed by the passive forms with sein in German and съм ‘to be’ in Bulgarian are compared. The voice meaning of the passive forms, the passive relation between the verbal person and the verbal action is assumed as fundamental. While in German there is a sharp delimitation in expressing process and result with the passive voice with werden and sein respectively, in Bulgarian the two passive form types are distinguished by a greater variety of connotations and they are mutually complementary. In addition to result, the passive forms with съм in Bulgarian may further denote process, iterativeness, etc. The meaning of the passive forms with sein is determined by both the semantics of the auxiliary verb and that of the past participle. The complex interaction between the elements of the analytical passive forms, their aspectual-temporal character in particular, affect the specific meaning of the respective forms in Bulgarian.1 aСливкова, Диана  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/slivkova197801248nas a2200121   4500008004100000245026000041210012500301300001300426490000600439520058900445100003301034856005901067       1977                        eng d00aЗалоговата принадлежност на три типа възвратни конструкции в немски език и съответните възвратни конструкции в български език (Genus-Zugehörigkei0 aЗалоговата принадлежност на три типа възвратни конструкции в нем  a77–1110 v23 aDie Reflexivkonstruktionen im Deutschen bilden dabei kein einheitlich zu beurteilendes System; in der deutschen Gegenwartssprache nehmen diese Konstruktionen (syntaktisch wie auch semantisch gesehen) unterschiedliche Positionen ein: Reflexivkonstruktionen mit außerpersönlichem Subjekt, von transitiven Verben gebildet, stehen in einer vom Passiv streng zu unterscheidenden Relation zum Aktiv, ja sie sind vielmehr dem Bereich des Aktivs selbst zuzuordnen, und Reflexivkonstruktionen mit persönlichem Subjekt, die zum Aktiv-Bereich gehören und eine Umwandlung ins Passiv zulassen.1 aСливкова, Диана  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/slivkova1977