01372nas a2200121   4500008004100000245025500041210012600296300001200422490000600434520069600440100004801136856006601184       1983                        eng d00aСемантична интерпретация на проблеми, свързани с категорията определеност/неопределеност (върху материал от българския и полския език)0 aСемантична интерпретация на проблеми свързани с категорията опре  a21–270 v83 aThe paper discusses some basic problems concerning the semantic interpretation of the category determination/non-determination. A solution was found out as regards the basic semantic opposition defined as an opposition of singularity/non-singularity. Some lexical and morphological means for expressing this opposition are analysed across the two languages. Drawing a clear-cut distinction among the means for expressing singularity and non-singularity (general and existential) in natural languages should be of importance not only as a theoretical insight into this particular category, but it can also be efficiently applied to the practical studies of the two languages under discussion.1 aКосеска-Тошева, Виолета  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/koseska-tosheva198300962nas a2200121   4500008004100000245009400041210009400135300001200229490000600241520047900247100004800726856006600774       1979                        eng d00aОтново по въпроса за екзистенциалните изречения0 aОтново по въпроса за екзистенциалните изречения  a11–170 v43 aSome problems concerning existential sentences in Polish and Bulgarian are discussed. Existential sentences are distinguished from sentences that are generally quantified on a logical basis; thus, the term „existential“, when referring to natural languages, is narrowed. The problem of negation of existential sentences and their temporal independence are also treated. The quantitative parameters of съм and има depend on the semantic structure of the predicates.1 aКосеска-Тошева, Виолета  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/koseska-tosheva1979