00332nas a2200109   4500008004100000245004300041210004100084300001200125490000700137100001900144856005900163       1986                        eng d00aL’emploi du parfait en vieux bulgare0 aL emploi du parfait en vieux bulgare  a35–400 v101 aFeuillet, Jack  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/feuillet198601230nas a2200145   4500008004100000245005600041210005500097300001200152490000600164520075600170653002400926653005600950100001901006856005901025       1982                        eng d00aSystèmes aspectuels en fran{\c c}ais et en bulgare0 aSystèmes aspectuels en fran c c ais et en bulgare  a26–360 v83 a<p>Not infrequently, phenomena which should be distinguished are subsumed under aspectual oppositions. Thus, for example, a contrastive study of French and Bulgarian reveals that French does not possess the aspectual opposition, restrictive opposition (imperfective/perfective), characteristic of the Slavic languages. However, the two languages possess two other common aspectual oppositions: 1) phase opposition which contrasts the forms for non-completion with those for completion; 2) the opposition of dynamism based on the opposition imperfect (nondynamic)/aorist (dynamic). The latter opposition may be considered as sub-aspectual in so far as it is an opposition between two temporal forms both of which are characterized by noncompletion.</p>10aContrastive Studies10aсъпоставителни изследвания1 aFeuillet, Jack  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/feuillet198200348nas a2200109   4500008004100000245005100041210005100092300001100143490000600154100001900160856005900179       1978                        eng d00aLes oppositions phonologiques du vieux bulgare0 aLes oppositions phonologiques du vieux bulgare  a3–110 v21 aFeuillet, Jack  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/feuillet1978