00827nas a2200121   4500008004100000245017400041210012500215300001400340490000700354520025300361100003300614856005800647       1989                        eng d00aСветогледът, отразен в българските и във френските фразеологизми с екзистенциално значение0 aСветогледът отразен в българските и във френските фразеологизми   a129–1320 v143 aThe article is an attempt at an ideogenetic investigation on a contrastive basis of Bulgarian and French verb idioms with an existential meaning aimed at an outline of similarities and differences in the specific linguistic reflection of the world.1 aХристов, Паисий  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/hristov198901525nas a2200121   4500008004100000245013000041210012400171300001200295490000600307520099900313100003301312856005801345       1981                        eng d00aЗа въпросителните и относителните думи в българския и френския език0 aЗа въпросителните и относителните думи в българския и френския е  a42–470 v63 aThe interrogative and relative words in Bulgarian and French are grouped into morpho-syntactic systems, differing in their contextual realizations. The peculiar structure of each language has made it necessary for the grammatical characteristics (gender, number, sentence function), in the two languages to be distributed dissimilarly. For the most part the interrogative words in both languages have the function of relative words as well, with the context shaping them more definitely. The bearer of definiteness appears to be the article. In Bulgarian it is invariable and it can be attached to every interrogative word. The system of relative words thus formed is completely symmetrical to the system of interrogative words. In French such symmetry can be traced only with quellequel. In all other cases the same word or two different words function both as interrogative and relative words. At the same time the relative words do not have the article as the bearer of the anaphorical link.1 aХристов, Паисий  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/hristov198101434nas a2200121   4500008004100000245010100041210010100142300001200243490000600255520096000261100003301221856005801254       1979                        eng d00aСпомагателните глаголи в българския и френския език0 aСпомагателните глаголи в българския и френския език  a12–170 v43 aThe choice of auxiliary verbs in a given language is not arbitrary. In their formation the composite verbal forms are based on the essential semantic categories of existence, attributiveness, possession, motion and action. According to other specific characteristics of languages (the nature of the participle, the development of the infinitive, etc.) these categories have been realized in different ways. Sometimes, one and the same idea is treated from different angles. Thus, for example, the idea of movement is the basis of the temporal relations. The movement from the past to the present and from the present to the future is expressed in French by the verbs of movement in space, whereas in Bulgarian, the movement from the present to the future is expressed by a modal verb. By inference, the following conclusion has been reached: from a semantic point of view the auxiliary verbs constitute a system based on the verb notions: be, have and do.1 aХристов, Паисий  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/hristov197901366nas a2200121   4500008004100000245016300041210012400204300001200328490000600340520080600346100003301152856005901185       1979                        eng d00aТрансформации при превода на българските наречия за начин на действие на френски език0 aТрансформации при превода на българските наречия за начин на дей  a79–880 v43 aTwo types of language transformations are observed in translating Bulgarian adverbs of manner into French. The first type are transformations which do not change the subject-predicate group: when the two languages differ, the Bulgarian adverb can be rendered into French by an adverbial phrase, by a cognate adverbial complement, accompanied by an adjective, corresponding to the Bulgarian adverb, or by an adjective which is syntactically related to the subject of the sentence or to a secondary part of the sentence. The second type is transformations in which the structure of the whole is changed, the sentence centre usually being a modal or an auxiliary verb. Thus, the Bulgarian adverbs of manner exhibit a tendency towards nominalization of the verb group when they are translated into French.1 aХристов, Паисий  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/hristov1979a01375nas a2200121   4500008004100000245015100041210012400192300001200316490000600328520082800334100003301162856005801195       1978                        eng d00aЕзикови особености на стихотворението „Борба“ от Христо Ботев на френски език0 aЕзикови особености на стихотворението Борба от Христо Ботев на ф  a73–830 v33 aThe study of two French translations of Hristo Botev’s poem „Struggle“ has led to the conclusion that the morphosyntactic structures of the original have been subjected to different kinds of transformations which depend above all on the characteristics of the target language, on the formal characteristics of the poem (rhyme, metrical structure, etc.), as well as on the personal preferences of the translator. On the content-plane three kinds of relations between the original and the translation are possible: complete correspondence, partial correspondence and lack of correspondence. The partial semantic correspondences which might be due to the impossibility of completely rendering the semantic structures of the original or to the personal preferences of the translator have proved most difficult to analyse.1 aХристов, Паисий  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/hristov1978