01363nas a2200121   4500008004100000245013500041210012400176300001200300490000700312520082500319100003701144856006001181       1991                        eng d00aОтносно употребите на аориста и перфекта в българския и румънския език0 aОтносно употребите на аориста и перфекта в българския и румънски  a29–350 v163 aIn the temporal systems of Bulgarian and Romanian the Aorist and the Perfect are the two verbal forms that render the action or the event as an accomplished fact in the past. Despite the common temporal and aspectual characteristics, they are distinguished by a number of semantic and functional peculiarities which are directly reflected in their uses. In order to determine the interaction between the two verbal tenses which occupy the same position upon the prime axis of orientation, it is necessary that they be analysed separately in each language. The analysis provides the basis for seeking the convergences and the divergences between the functional contexts of the Aorist and the Perfect in Bulgarian and Romanian. The results can be very useful for the correct rendering of the temporal forms in translation.1 aСтоянова, Даниела  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/stoyanova199101240nas a2200121   4500008004100000245024300041210012700284300001400411490000700425520058900432100003701021856006001058       1989                        eng d00aФункционално-семантични паралели в употребите на дателни местоименни клитики с посесивно значение в българския и румънския език0 aФункционалносемантични паралели в употребите на дателни местоиме  a121–1280 v143 aThe paper discusses the use of the dative pronominal clitics in Bulgarian and Romanian as one of the grammatical means of expressing possession. It is an attempt to outline the major aspects of the contrastive study of a linguistic phenomenon not to be traced in the other Slavic and Romance languages, but attested in other Balkan languages as well. Although the dative clitics have not been introduced into the system of the Romanian possessive pronouns, as is the case with Bulgarian, the results of the analysis point out to a great number of semantic and functional similarities.1 aСтоянова, Даниела  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/stoyanova198900577nas a2200133   4500008004100000245012800041210012600169300001400295490000700309653001100316653001900327100003700346856006000383       1986                        eng d00aЧетвърти българо-румънски симпозиум в София: секция по езикознание0 aЧетвърти българорумънски симпозиум в София секция по езикознание  a120–1210 v1110aEvents10aХроника1 aСтоянова, Даниела  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/stoyanova1986