01372nas a2200121   4500008004100000245020800041210012600249300001200375490000600387520076500393100003301158856005901191       1978                        eng d00aПо въпроса за хронологичната координация при подчинените допълнителни изречения в българския и френския език0 aПо въпроса за хронологичната координация при подчинените допълни  a34–400 v33 aThe author studies contrastively the formal means used in Bulgarian and French in the organization of the chronological co-ordination as regards the introducing fact in subordinate object clauses. The study shows that within the framework of non-actuality, Bulgarian uses both the past tenses system (plusquamperfectum, imperfectum, futurum praeteriti) and the primary co-ordination system (perfectum, praesens, futurum), while French makes use only of the past co-ordination system. In the past, i. e. when the fact of the subordinate clause has ceased to be actual, the use of the grammatical tenses of the primary co-ordination system, though surprising to the foreigner, does not mean that Bulgarian is illogical; on the contrary, it shows its originality.1 aСимеонов, Йосиф  uhttp://www.scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/simeonov1978