@article {Feuillet1986, title = {L{\textquoteright}emploi du parfait en vieux bulgare}, journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика}, volume = {10}, year = {1986}, pages = {35{\textendash}40}, author = {Feuillet, Jack} } @article {Feuillet1982, title = {Syst{\`e}mes aspectuels en fran{\c c}ais et en bulgare}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {8}, year = {1982}, pages = {26{\textendash}36}, abstract = {

Not infrequently, phenomena which should be distinguished are subsumed under aspectual oppositions. Thus, for example, a contrastive study of French and Bulgarian reveals that French does not possess the aspectual opposition, restrictive opposition (imperfective/perfective), characteristic of the Slavic languages. However, the two languages possess two other common aspectual oppositions: 1) phase opposition which contrasts the forms for non-completion with those for completion; 2) the opposition of dynamism based on the opposition imperfect (nondynamic)/aorist (dynamic). The latter opposition may be considered as sub-aspectual in so far as it is an opposition between two temporal forms both of which are characterized by noncompletion.

}, keywords = {Contrastive Studies, съпоставителни изследвания}, author = {Feuillet, Jack} } @article {Feuillet1978, title = {Les oppositions phonologiques du vieux bulgare}, journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика}, volume = {2}, year = {1978}, pages = {3{\textendash}11}, author = {Feuillet, Jack} }