@article {Младенова1987,
	title = {Български лексикални заемки чрез арумънско посредничество в новогръцкия език},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {12},
	year = {1987},
	pages = {19{\textendash}26},
	abstract = {The paper is about twenty six Bulgarian loanwords in New Greek dialects, commonly cited to have been borrowed through Aromanian, viz., αστριάχα, βιρβιρίτσα, γρέντα, ζιάρι, ζμπόρος, μπαζντραβίτσα, μπίμ(η)τσα, νήλα, ρουγαίζω, μολίτσα, καστραβέτς, κοζόκα, κλακατίζω, μπιστιρή, μπέλα, γκάλιος, γκόλ{\textquoteright}ους, γκουστερίτσα, ζαδούχαβ, κόσα, λιάσα, μοθσίτσα, πολίτσα, ρουγκόζ, γκαρλίτσα, ρόποτος. The following criteria of Aromanian mediation are established: phonological (the Bulgarian loanwords acquired in New Greek bear some traces of the Aromanian phonetic system), semantic (pastoral terminology), chronological (archaic Bulgarian borrowings in Daco-Romanian and Aromanian, features of which re-appear in New Greek), and areal.},
	author = {Младенова, Олга}
}
@article {Алексова1981,
	title = {Българо-румънски езикови отношения},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {6},
	year = {1981},
	pages = {161{\textendash}180},
	abstract = {The article is a review of the linguistic phenomena, common to Bulgarian and Rumanian, which are the result of the centuries-long interference between the two languages. The review consists of two parts with a view to the conditions (oral and cultural contacts) which engendered the common features of the two languages. The first part deals with the phonetic, morphosyntactic, word-formative, lexical, onomastic, semantic and phraseological features of Rumanian, which are considered to be the result of the interaction between the languages of the Slav-Bulgarian and Rumanian population during the long period of their living together north of the Danube. The lexical, onomastic, word-formative, semantic and phraseological features of Bulgarian, which are to be accounted for by the influence of Rumanian, are also considered. The second part deals with elements of the Bulgarian language which penetrated through literary sources into standard Rumanian during the period of its formation as a result of the Bulgarian cultural influence. It also considers the lexical elements borrowed from Rumanian during the period when the lexical norms of modern standard Bulgarian were established.},
	author = {Алексова, Василка and Младенова, Олга}
}
